Todays Date: Click here to add this website to your favorites
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wyoming

In the latest court battle over the steamy 2004 Super Bowl halftime show, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that CBS should not be fined $550,000 for Janet Jackson's infamous "wardrobe malfunction."

The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals held its ground even after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered a review in light of the high court's ruling in a related Fox television case. In that case, it said the Federal Communications Commission could threaten fines over the use of even a single curse word uttered on live TV.

But Circuit Judge Marjorie Rendell said the Fox case only "fortifies our opinion" that the FCC was wrong to fine CBS over the halftime show.

The three-judge panel reviewed three decades of FCC rulings and concluded the agency was changing its policy, without warning, by fining CBS for fleeting nudity.

"An agency may not apply a policy to penalize conduct that occurred before the policy was announced," Rendell wrote.

CBS argues that the FCC had previously applied the same decency standards to words and images — and excused fleeting instances of both.

Rendell said that long-standing policy appeared to change without notice in March 2004 — a month after the act at the Super Bowl, held in Houston.


Attorney Web Design by Law Promo

© Click The Law. All Rights Reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Click The Law.
as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or
a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyer | Las Vegas Business Litigation
   Legal Spotlight
   Exclusive Commentaries
   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Indianapolis Trial Lawyers
Riley Bennett & Egloff
Indiana Trial Lawyers
www.rbelaw.com
Oregon Criminal Defense
Eugene Criminal Defense Lawyer
Coit & Associates, P.C.
www.criminaldefenseoregon.com
Eugene Criminal Defense Lawyer
Eugene DUI, Civil Litigation. Call (541) 338-9111
www.arnoldlawfirm.com
Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorneys
Las Vegas Wrongful Death Attorneys
www.mgalaw.com
Pittsburgh DUI Laywer
Pennsylvania DUI Lawyer
DUI Defens. Call (412) 429-4360
www.gbmlawpittsburgh.com
Houston Auto Accident Lawyers
Houston truck accident attorneys
Houston insurance claim attorneys www.hurtinhouston.com
Palm Beach Construction Law Attorney
Florida Construction Law
Construction Contracts
www.palmbeachconstructionlaw.org
Indiana business litigation attorney
Price Waicukauski & Riley
Indiana Class Action
www.price-law.com
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
www.lawrsm.com
Sydney Criminal Lawyers
Sydney criminal defence lawyers
Criminal Barristers and Solicitors
www.criminallaw.com.au
New York SEC Attorneys
Securities Regulatory Counsel
Securities Litigation Lawyer
www.herskovitslaw.com
   More Legal News  1  2  3  4  5 
   Legal News Links
  Law Firm News
  Law Firm Web Design
   Law Firm Site Links
  Legal Marketing Insight
  Lawyer Websites
  Crisis Legal News
  Law Firm Network
  Chicago Contract Disputes
  Law Firm Logos
  Attorney Website Design
  How to Start a Law Firm
  Lawyer Website Design
  Daily Bar News
  Doctor Criminal Defense