Todays Date: Click here to add this website to your favorites
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wyoming

Robbins Umeda LLP announces that the firm commenced a class action lawsuit on October 7, 2011, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased the common stock of Stereotaxis, Inc. between February 28, 2011 and August 9, 2011 against certain of the Company's officers and directors for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Umeda LLP and Carey, Danis & Lowe.

Stereotaxis designs, manufactures, and markets a cardiology instrument control system, called Niobe®, for use in a hospital's interventional surgical suite to enhance the treatment of coronary artery disease and arrhythmias. The Company also markets the Odyssey system as a data management solution for remote viewing and recording of live interventional procedures. The Company's executive offices are located in St. Louis, Missouri.

The complaint alleges that beginning on February 28, 2011, Chief Executive Officer Michael Kaminski, along with certain officers and directors at Stereotaxis, issued a series of positive statements to investors about the business condition and future prospects of the Company that were materially false and misleading, and that caused shares of the Company's stock to trade at artificially high prices.

In particular, the complaint alleges that officials at the Company failed to disclose to investors material adverse facts that: (1) Stereotaxis was unable to leverage its extensive portfolio and scale of products and services in a strategically beneficial manner; (2) market feedback from users of the Company's technology was "mixed"; (3) the Niobe system was far from the "standard of care" and needed "fundamental product improvements"; (4) demand for the Niobe and Odyssey systems was weak, and that the number of units being sold was decreasing; (5) the reported backlog of orders did not fairly represent future revenue the Company expected to recognize; and that (6) the Company overstated its market edge.

On August 8, 2011, the Company announced financial results for the second quarter of 2011 that revealed that the Company was performing well below expectations. Additionally, the press release disclosed to investors that the Company was forced to suspend its full year guidance for 2011, and that Daniel Johnston was resigning as the Chief Financial Officer. On this news shares of Stereotaxis declined by more than 58% of their value, closing on August 9, 2011 at just $1.19 per share.

If you purchased Stereotaxis stock during the Class Period and wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from October 10, 2011. To discuss your shareholder rights, please contact attorney Gregory E. Del Gaizo at 800-350-6003 or via the shareholder information form.

Robbins Umeda LLP represents individual and institutional shareholders in derivative, direct, and class action lawsuits. The law firm's skilled litigation teams include former federal prosecutors, former defense counsel from top multinational corporate law firms, and career shareholder rights attorneys. Robbins Umeda LLP has helped its clients realize more than $1 billion of value for themselves and the companies in which they have invested. For more information, please go to http://www.robbinsumeda.com


Attorney Web Design by Law Promo

© Click The Law. All Rights Reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Click The Law.
as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or
a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyer | Las Vegas Business Litigation
   Legal Spotlight
   Exclusive Commentaries
   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Indianapolis Trial Lawyers
Riley Bennett & Egloff
Indiana Trial Lawyers
www.rbelaw.com
Oregon Criminal Defense
Eugene Criminal Defense Lawyer
Coit & Associates, P.C.
www.criminaldefenseoregon.com
Eugene Criminal Defense Lawyer
Eugene DUI, Civil Litigation. Call (541) 338-9111
www.arnoldlawfirm.com
Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorneys
Las Vegas Wrongful Death Attorneys
www.mgalaw.com
Pittsburgh DUI Laywer
Pennsylvania DUI Lawyer
DUI Defens. Call (412) 429-4360
www.gbmlawpittsburgh.com
Houston Auto Accident Lawyers
Houston truck accident attorneys
Houston insurance claim attorneys www.hurtinhouston.com
Palm Beach Construction Law Attorney
Florida Construction Law
Construction Contracts
www.palmbeachconstructionlaw.org
Indiana business litigation attorney
Price Waicukauski & Riley
Indiana Class Action
www.price-law.com
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
www.lawrsm.com
Sydney Criminal Lawyers
Sydney criminal defence lawyers
Criminal Barristers and Solicitors
www.criminallaw.com.au
New York SEC Attorneys
Securities Regulatory Counsel
Securities Litigation Lawyer
www.herskovitslaw.com
   More Legal News  1  2  3  4  5 
   Legal News Links
  Law Firm News
  Law Firm Web Design
   Law Firm Site Links
  Legal Marketing Insight
  Lawyer Websites
  Crisis Legal News
  Law Firm Network
  Chicago Contract Disputes
  Law Firm Logos
  Attorney Website Design
  How to Start a Law Firm
  Lawyer Website Design
  Daily Bar News
  Doctor Criminal Defense