Todays Date: Click here to add this website to your favorites
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wyoming

The Supreme Court is considering whether government regulators may still police the airwaves for curse words and other coarse content at a time when so many Americans have unregulated cable television, and the Internet is awash in easily accessible adult material.

The justices are hearing arguments Tuesday in a First Amendment case that pits the Obama administration against the nation's television networks. The material at issue includes the isolated use of expletives as well as fines against broadcasters who showed a woman's nude buttocks on a 2003 episode of ABC's "NYPD Blue."

The broadcasters want the court to overturn a 1978 decision that upheld the Federal Communications Commission's authority to regulate both radio and television content, at least during the hours when children are likely to be watching or listening. That period includes the prime-time hours before 10 p.m.

At the very least, the networks say the FCC's current policy is too hard to figure out, penalizing the use of particular curse words on awards programming but not in the airing of the movie "Saving Private Ryan," for example.

The administration said that even with the explosion of entertainment options, broadcast programming remains dominant. It also needs to be kept as a dependable "safe haven" of milder programming, the administration said.


Attorney Web Design by Law Promo

© Click The Law. All Rights Reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Click The Law.
as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or
a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.

Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyer | Las Vegas Business Litigation
   Legal Spotlight
   Exclusive Commentaries
   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Indianapolis Trial Lawyers
Riley Bennett & Egloff
Indiana Trial Lawyers
www.rbelaw.com
Oregon Criminal Defense
Eugene Criminal Defense Lawyer
Coit & Associates, P.C.
www.criminaldefenseoregon.com
Eugene Criminal Defense Lawyer
Eugene DUI, Civil Litigation. Call (541) 338-9111
www.arnoldlawfirm.com
Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorneys
Las Vegas Wrongful Death Attorneys
www.mgalaw.com
Pittsburgh DUI Laywer
Pennsylvania DUI Lawyer
DUI Defens. Call (412) 429-4360
www.gbmlawpittsburgh.com
Houston Auto Accident Lawyers
Houston truck accident attorneys
Houston insurance claim attorneys www.hurtinhouston.com
Palm Beach Construction Law Attorney
Florida Construction Law
Construction Contracts
www.palmbeachconstructionlaw.org
Indiana business litigation attorney
Price Waicukauski & Riley
Indiana Class Action
www.price-law.com
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
www.lawrsm.com
Sydney Criminal Lawyers
Sydney criminal defence lawyers
Criminal Barristers and Solicitors
www.criminallaw.com.au
New York SEC Attorneys
Securities Regulatory Counsel
Securities Litigation Lawyer
www.herskovitslaw.com
   More Legal News  1  2  3  4  5 
   Legal News Links
  Law Firm News
  Law Firm Web Design
   Law Firm Site Links
  Legal Marketing Insight
  Lawyer Websites
  Crisis Legal News
  Law Firm Network
  Chicago Contract Disputes
  Law Firm Logos
  Attorney Website Design
  How to Start a Law Firm
  Lawyer Website Design
  Daily Bar News
  Doctor Criminal Defense