|
|
|
3 men guilty on all counts in teens' slaying
Legal Topics |
2014/05/02 20:32
|
Three gang members have been found guilty of killing two Southern California teens and injuring two others during a 2011 shooting near an apartment complex playground.
The San Bernardino County district attorney's office says a jury convicted the men of two counts each of murder and three each of attempted murder. The verdict was read Tuesday.
The defendants were accused of killing 18-year-old Andrew Jackson and 17-year-old Quinn McCaleb as they walked with a group of teenagers in Redlands. Two other teens were shot but survived their injuries.
Authorities say one of the gunmen was seeking revenge after he was jumped by several men, and attacked the victims in a case of mistaken identity. The victims had no gang ties or prior contact with the defendants' gang. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Bradley Ney - Washington, DC Business Litigation Lawyer
Court Watch |
2014/04/30 18:20
|
Whether you're an individual, small, or medium-sized business, you deserve the finest legal representation to litigate your civil and criminal matters from an experienced attorney. You need an attorney who understands your and fights for your goals. An attorney who can work with you to achieve those goals, whether they be business or personal. With over ten years of experience at two of the nation’s preeminent law firms, Brad excels at providing unrelenting representation and imaginative problem solving in high stake matters.The Law Office of W. Bradley Ney offers individuals and business clients the highest quality litigation services comparable to any large law firm attorney.
Graduating with honors from The Ohio State University in 1999 and Cornell Law School in 2002, Brad has honed his legal litigating skills in the DC offices of Skadden Arps and Dow Lohnes, PLLC. Practicing business litigation, securities litigation and white collar criminal defense, Brad has represented clients in both federal and state courts across the country, and even in regulatory matters before agencies including but not limited to the SEC, IRS and FAA. Brad has significant criminal trial and appellate experience. He has taken on felony cases from the Maryland Public Defender’s Office pro bono. Brad has been a guest lecturer on contract litigation at Cornell Law School; has served as editor and research assistant to Professor Robert Summers (co-author of White & Summers’ UCC Treatise); and published on the subject of best practices in responding to subpoenas. Brad began his solo practice in 2011 on a contract basis by providing high-caliber litigation services to law firms.In 2013, he expanded his practice to provide quality legal services to individuals and small and medium-sized business.
If you find yourself in need of the a Washington, DC Business Litigation Lawyer, contact the Law Office of W. Bradley Ney. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court considers whistleblower free speech rights
Headline Legal News |
2014/04/30 18:19
|
When Edward Lane testified about corruption at a community college program he headed in Alabama, he was fired.
The Supreme Court on Monday considered whether the First Amendment protects Lane and millions of other public employees from job retaliation when they offer testimony about government misconduct in court.
The high court has previously ruled that the constitutional right to free speech protects public workers only when they speak out as citizens, not when they act in their official roles.
Most justices appeared to side with Lane's view that court testimony revealing official misconduct should be constitutionally protected even if it covers facts a government employee learned at work.
But the justices struggled over whether that protection should automatically cover all public workers, even police officials or criminal investigators whose job duties require them to testify in court about specific cases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court revives lawsuit vs. state Medicaid expansion
Legal Topics |
2014/04/25 17:56
|
The Arizona Court of Appeals on Tuesday revived a lawsuit challenging Gov. Jan Brewer's expansion of the state's Medicaid insurance plan for the poor, ruling that Republican lawmakers have the right to sue over their contention that a hospital assessment that funds the expansion is a tax requiring a two-thirds vote of the Legislature.
Republicans in the House and Senate sued last year, saying only a simple majority last June passed the expansion bill that included the assessment. A Maricopa County judge in February dismissed the case, saying lawmakers were suing over a lost political battle because the Legislature itself decides whether a supermajority vote is needed.
But the appeals court rejected that decision and sent the case back to Judge Katherine Cooper for more action. In an 11-page ruling, the unanimous three-judge panel said the 36 Republican lawmakers who sued could have defeated House Bill 2010 if the supermajority vote was required, so it was proper for Cooper to decide if the Arizona Constitution required that vote.
The ruling was a major loss for Brewer, who pushed the Medicaid bill through the Legislature by cobbling together a coalition of minority Democrats and 14 Republicans.
She is one of only a handful of Republican governors who embraced Medicaid expansion, a key part of President Barack Obama's health care law. In all, 25 states plus Washington, D.C., are moving ahead with the expansion, while 19 states have turned it down. An additional six states are weighing options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Law Office of Rita O. White - Canton Criminal & DUI Lawyers
Court Watch |
2014/04/25 17:55
|
If you're facing a legal issue and seek guidance, the Law Office of Rita O. White is here to help. Tackling any legal matter without a trained professional can negatively impact the outcome of your legal situation. Our Plymouth Canton Criminal lawyers understand the stress that comes with looming legal issues which is why we work tirelessly to support our clients no matter the situation.
We believe in giving clients our full attention and treating them with care and respect. When you work with us, you'll get the benefit of:
Caring and knowledeable lawyers
Convenient office hours
Reasonable attorney fees
Don't risk anything! Our dedicated team of lawyers are always available to offer guidance and support. To set up an appointment today or learn more about our Plymouth Canton Criminal law practice contact us at the Law Office of Rita O. White today. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court declines to block drug ruling in patent case
Legal Topics |
2014/04/21 21:50
|
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday declined to temporarily block a lower court ruling that opens the world's best-selling multiple sclerosis drug to competition from generic rivals next month.
The decision is a victory for rivals challenging the patents of Israel-based Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., maker of the drug Copaxone.
Teva claims the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit wrongly overturned five of its patents for the drug. That ruling allows rivals Mylan Inc., Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Sandoz, Inc., to start selling cheaper generic versions in May instead of September 2015.
The Supreme Court has agreed to consider the case, but arguments won't take place until its new term begins in October and it could be next year before a decision is reached. Teva said it would suffer irreparable harm if the appeals court decision was not postponed. Copaxone brought the company $3.2 billion in U.S. sales last year.
In a one-page ruling, Roberts said he was not convinced Teva would suffer such harm. If Teva ultimately prevails in the case, Roberts said, the company would be able to recover damages from the generic rivals for past patent infringement. He acknowledged that Teva has "a fair prospect" of ultimately winning the case at the high court.
Roberts oversees emergency appeals from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which hears appeals in patent cases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
High court to hear dispute about TV over Internet
Headline Legal News |
2014/04/21 21:49
|
Thirty years ago, big media companies failed to convince the Supreme Court of the threat posed by home video recordings.
Now they're back — and trying to rein in a different innovation that they say threatens their financial well-being.
The battle has moved out of viewers' living rooms, where people once marveled at their ability to pop a cassette into a recorder and capture their favorite programs or the sporting event they wouldn't be home to see.
The new legal fight shifts to the Supreme Court Tuesday with arguments against a startup business using Internet-based technology to give subscribers the ability to watch programs anywhere they can take portable devices.
Aereo takes free television signals from the airwaves and sends them over the Internet to paying subscribers in 11 cities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headline Legal News for You to Reach America's Best Legal Professionals. The latest legal news and information - Law Firm, Lawyer and Legal Professional news in the Media. |
|
|
